Today’s football game was a first in so many ways. It was the first game of the 2012
season. It was the first game played
after Joe Paterno passed away. It was
the first game of a new era under Coach Bill O’Brien and the first game ever in
Penn State athletic history where a Penn State team is subject to onerous NCAA
sanctions. It was also the first
football game since Jerry Sandusky was put behind bars.
I was apprehensive about this first game, as I imagine many
fans were. I just wasn’t sure how it would
feel to be in Beaver Stadium again after the horrible events of these last nine
months. Tears welled up in me as the
team entered the field at the Pep Rally on Friday night.
But at the game itself, it felt good to be in the stands
again among a crowd of very enthusiastic Nittany Lion supporters. People seemed intent on showing their support
for this team of athletes that chose to re-commit themselves to Penn State.
Both on Friday at the Pep Rally and on Saturday, I was also
impressed by the “One Team” solidarity message conveyed by those involved with
Intercollegiate Athletics. At the Pep
Rally, coaches from numerous sports teams pumped up the crowd. At the game itself, over 600 varsity
student-athletes from Penn State sports took the field wearing grey “One Team”
t-shirts. They formed a welcoming line for the football team and Bill O’Brien
as they entered the field for the first game of the season.
There was a message there beyond the rallying call of “One Team”. To me the message to fans and especially to the
media was the number of individuals who are supported by the revenues produced
by Penn State football. Penn State has
only two sports that are profitable enough to support other intercollegiate
athletics: football and men’s basketball. That’s true not only at Penn State, but at
any major college athletics program you can name.
And so when Dr. Mark Emmert desires to eliminate Penn
State’s “football culture”, whatever that is, or when the media or other
individuals continue to talk about how it would have been so much more “just”
for Penn State to receive the death penalty, it was good for Penn State to try
to send a message about the number of athletes supported by Penn State football
revenues. Whether the media receives or
conveys the message, though, is a big question.
Did they? I wasn’t watching the
game on TV nor did we record it.
The idea that Penn State has a “football culture” that
dominates everything at Penn State, including academics, has been an affront to
so many people, including me as a member of Penn State’s faculty who is asked
to report on academic progress of any scholarship athlete three times each
semester.
It is mystifying to me how such a conclusion could have been
reached as a result of the Sandusky scandal, which had nothing to do with
academics. In fact, today’s Centre
Daily Times published an article
that debunks the accusations made publicly by former Vice President of Student
Affairs Dr. Vicki Triponey regarding favoritism towards football players in relation
to off the field conduct. Will the media pick up on this
article the way they picked up on Dr. Triponey’s accusations? I challenge ESPN and the Bleacher Report to
do just that!
My view is that Penn State has always been a model for the
interplay of athletics and academics, and the NCAA’s own statistics on
graduation rates and the lack of specific NCAA rules violations committed by
Penn State coaches and student-athletes prove that. Throughout the day at Beaver Stadium, Penn
State chose to display some of those statistics. Sending another message to the media? Did
they even notice?
I also find it distressing that Penn State feels it
necessary to take the offensive on something that has been a tremendous source
of pride for Penn State for so many years, and so much a part of former head
coach Joe Paterno’s legacy in particular.
But perhaps it was good to remind the fans of what has made
Penn State so special over the years. I will
display photos of those statistics shown to use on my blog.
But let’s get to this game against Ohio University. It didn’t surprise me that we lost. In fact, Terry and I had both anticipated
that Ohio would be one of Penn State’s toughest non-conference opponents this
year.
What surprised me was the way we lost. We were expecting the offense to
struggle. Not only was O’Brien
introducing a very complicated offensive scheme, Penn State had lost its star
running back Silas Redd and kicker/punter extraordinaire Anthony Fera. It’s hard to win games when your running game
is in trouble. So we were happy when at
the end of the first half Penn State was ahead 14-3.
It’s hard to win games, also, when your kicker doesn’t have
enough of a leg for the coach to try a field goal from the 30-yard line. At least that's why I assume that the
coach decided to go for it on 4th and 5 with a pass when we were
ahead 14-10. I suppose Coach O’Brien
might have just been playing aggressively in the third quarter, knowing there was
plenty of time left at that point in the game.
He warned us he would be aggressive!
But it seemed to me a play that defied logic. Don’t you always take the points if you can
get them?
No, what surprised me was what appeared to be a complete
defensive collapse in the second half of the game. Penn State had not lost much talent on the
defense, and we had an experienced squad. The defense was able to hold Ohio to just a
field goal in the first half, and we were feeling pretty good about that. But in the third quarter, Ohio drove down the
field twice and picked apart Penn State’s defense along the way. These drives consisted of short gains, no big
plays: 12 plays for 82 yards; 8 plays
for 70 yards. Basically the defense was
beaten up on the line of scrimmage.
Still, with Ohio leading 17-14 after Ohio scored two
touchdowns in the third quarter, Penn State was a little behind but could still
win. A big defensive play, or a decent
offensive drive, and they could get ahead again. The fourth quarter looked a bit more
promising when the defense held Ohio to a field goal and the kicker
missed. But Penn State’s offense made
two first downs and then stalled. A punt
downed at the 7-yard line gave Ohio a long field and the defense could not stop
them chewing up the clock. With 2:47
left in the game and a ten-point deficit, it was unlikely that this offense
was going to produce any NFL-type miracles.
And they didn’t.
As for the defense, perhaps the new defensive schemes taught
by our defensive coordinator Ted Roof were harder for this team to learn than
we expected.
Or maybe Ohio was the better team on Saturday. They made the right half-time adjustments and
got some big plays and Penn State didn’t.
They deserve our congratulations and respect.
Coach Joe Paterno used to say that a team makes its most
progress in a season between its first and second games. So we will see what adjustments the coaches
make for the Virginia game. I am sure
they have learned a lot about how their players react in a true game situation.
As for the crowd at the game, most people stayed until that
final touchdown. The crowd was noisy and
tried its best to help the defense do its job whenever Ohio was driving.
I was glad to see the student section actually be mostly filled
at the start of the game. The loss was
disappointing, but as I exited the stadium I talked to several Ohio fans and
expressed my respect for how their team played the game. Every Ohio fan told me how well they were
treated by the Penn State fans they met.
That was good to hear.
Penn State has to rebuild its reputation on so many levels. Being a place that visiting team fans will
talk about as fun to visit is one way to send a message that Penn State in fact
represents one of the best environments anywhere in college football and
intercollegiate athletics.
I started this post discussing “firsts”. In addition to the firsts that affected all
Penn State fans, I had a personal first.
It was the only time in the 25 years I have been married to my husband
Terry that I have not sat beside him for a game at Beaver Stadium. I kept imagining his comments throughout the
game, especially: “It’s going to be a long
season”.
But we’ll see. It’s one loss so far, not an entire season.
I will get to that story in a different blog post. It’s a
happy story involving three PSU fans from Nebraska and the need to find an
extra seat, not a sad story at all. However, my photos showing the “view from
the stands” at Beaver Stadium are taken from quite a different location in the
stadium than usual.
Note: If you are reading
this post in the Centre Daily Times or the Bleacher Report, you can see those photos on my regular
blog, www.viewfromstands.blogspot.com
Thanks for the article. As a collegian reporter in the 90s, I covered so many different sports. One thing visiting fans always said is how much they loved PSU because we appreciated great sports. There are some amazing moments all over campus, just between the end zones of Beaver Stadium . . . any Alumni knows that.
ReplyDeleteYes there are! Had three folks from Nebraska last weekend go to a soccer game and a volleyball game to cheer on Penn State. There are always lots of options for sports on campus. Thanks for your comment.
DeleteCarolyn: I initially blamed the defense for the second half turnaround, but after looking at the big picture, it was the offense's inability to keep the ball that kept the defense on the field on a hot humid day. Ohio ran a very quick offense and the D could not sub guys in. They wore us down. Penn State had the ball for 6:26 in the 3rd Q and only 3:41 in the 4th!!! Of our 21 first downs, only 8 occurred in the second half. I think had we had just one long drive to give the D a rest, it would have made a huge difference. And that TD that should have been an INT was a killer!
ReplyDeleteGood point doc. Our offense was stuffed in the second half. It always comes down to a play here or a play there making a difference in the game. Why do I find myself quoting Joe Paterno a lot these days about game strategy? Including "good teams find a way to win".
Delete